Can someone please explain how the violent rape of a woman and conning a hedge fund out of money can possibly be on the same page in the sentencing handbook (if there is such a thing)? Does someone, somewhere who has a very important job title look at those two offences and thinks ‘yep that’s fair’? If so, he should be summarily fired and forced to track down his lost marbles! What am I ranting about? Sorry, yes, I should probably explain…..
This tells the story of a guy who was pretty much broke, surviving only on State handouts, but who is a World class liar. He convinced some extremely wealthy people to give him lots of money by telling them that he was a confidante of the rich and famous; he span a tale of life as a super rich philanthropist while living in a council house in Wales. The one question that immediately sprang to my mind was ‘why did no-one check this guy out’???? However wealthy a company, do they seriously just hand over £1 million without doing any kind of background check???? How daft can you get?
This chap is a complete fantasist and a conman who committed a crime, yes, but does he deserve to go to prison for 8 years? The company got most of its money back; really, who was hurt?
On the other hand we have a guy who raped a woman who was on her way home. He attacked her when she was alone, at night. He grabbed her by the hair, threw her on the ground, punched her in the face and then raped her. This memory will stay with her for the rest of her life; she has been violated in the worst way possible. Her physical scars will quickly heal but the emotional ones will be raw and painful for many years to come.
What sentence was handed down to the animal that did this to her? 8 years.
I realise that there is often far more to these cases than is reported in the media but can anyone please explain the logic here? For me, there is none and I am sad that we live in a World where taking cash carries the same penalty as rape.
What do you think? I’d love to hear from you